Bluewashed

How the Dive Industry Sells Conservation Without Delivering It

Scuba diving generates up to $20 billion per year globally. It’s often pitched as a win-win: a booming tourism sector that funds and drives ocean conservation. But is that promise backed by reality? Or is it more bubble than ballast? Let’s dive deeper.

A Loving but Honest Look

First, a caveat: we love diving. We love dive communities. We love the guides, captains, and shop owners who’ve shared reefs, kelp forests, and undersea vistas with us. Diving can spark wonder, connection, even life-changing commitments to ocean protection. But love doesn’t mean silence.

This isn’t an attack on divers or dive culture. It’s a call for the industry to align its love for the ocean with practices that truly sustain it.

If the industry wants to claim conservation wins, it must confront the uncomfortable gaps between promise and practice. Otherwise, the “diving equals conservation” narrative risks becoming a comforting myth that allows us to keep consuming experiences while sidestepping the deeper structural changes the ocean actually needs.

Follow the Money

In many regions, tourism profits rarely trickle down. Dive guides and boat crews often earn subsistence wages while profits fly offshore to foreign operators or parent companies. When conservation depends on low wages and unequal labor dynamics, it isn’t sustainable..

Ownership matters. Who owns the shop? Who owns the boat? Who controls the marketing? Who leads the dives—locals or expats? Too often, not the local communities who have stewarded coasts for centuries. Studies show that local communities often see only a sliver of tourism revenue, sometimes less than 15%, while carrying most of the costs. In places like Thailand, Belize, and the Maldives, much of the money leaks overseas to foreign companies, imports, and middlemen. That leaves locals with limited benefit, even as they deal with polluted water, damaged mangroves, and rising housing costs.

The irony is sharp: coastal communities that have long protected reefs for fisheries or cultural reasons often find themselves priced out of the very waters they defended, while outsiders sell those reefs as product. That is not conservation. That is extraction with better branding.

Thin Margins, Thin Commitments

It’s easy to imagine dive shops as cash machines: boats full of tourists, steady gear rentals, certification fees. But the reality is tougher. Most operators run on razor-thin margins. Boats are expensive to fuel and maintain. Insurance is steep. Dive gear requires constant upkeep. Weather disruptions, economic downturns, or a single hurricane season can wipe out a season’s profits.

When survival is the priority, there is little room to fund the revolution. Supporting MPAs, lobbying for stronger protections, or financing coral restoration all demand capital, stability, and long-term planning. But many shops live month-to-month, caught between pleasing tourists and staying afloat. Even well-intentioned owners may find themselves unable to deliver meaningful conservation contributions.

Eco-Optics and Greenwashing

So what fills the gap? Optics. “Reef-safe” sunscreens in the shop. Monthly beach cleanups. Voluntary eco-certifications with glossy logos. These efforts make for great Instagram posts and feel good in the moment. But too often, they stop there.

Certification without independent verification is little more than a sticker. A cleanup without systemic waste management is a drop in the tide. A sunscreen display without broader advocacy for chemical regulation shifts responsibility onto consumers rather than addressing root causes.

This isn’t to say these efforts are worthless. They build awareness, foster community, and sometimes spark change. But when they are used as substitutes for structural solutions, they risk becoming conservation theater: performance without impact.

Tourism's Hidden Costs

Tourism doesn’t just bring divers. It brings pressure: on roads, housing, freshwater supplies, food systems, and waste infrastructure. On small islands, one tourist can use more freshwater in a week than a local family uses in a month. Dive resorts compete with villages for fish, vegetables, and electricity.

And the waste footprint is massive. Tourists often flush sewage into septic systems unfit for coral-fringed coasts, or leave behind plastic packaging that outpaces local landfill capacity. Air travel compounds the burden: a single long-haul flight to a dive destination emits more CO₂ than many coastal families generate in a year.

Local communities carry these costs long after divers fly home. Conservation framed only in terms of tourist dollars ignores the quieter, slower erosion of local resilience.

Shifting Baselines Underwater

Ask a first-time diver about their experience, and the answer will almost always be awe: “It was beautiful.” And they’re right. Seeing fish flit across a reef, even a degraded one, is magical. But here lies the problem of shifting baselines.

Hawaiian coral colony before and after heat stress and algal overgrowth. Image credit: Keoki Stender

A reef of rubble, algae, and a few hardy fish may feel rich to someone who’s never seen a living wall of branching corals or clouds of parrotfish. Without historical memory, expectations erode. Conservation urgency dulls. A generation of divers can believe they are witnessing a thriving reef while in fact swimming through its skeletal remains.

This isn’t just semantics. Shifting baselines affect political will, funding priorities, and what counts as “success” in conservation. If divers are the industry’s ambassadors, what story are they bringing home?

Forty Years of Déjà Vu

Dive tourism has been pitched as a conservation solution for over four decades. And to be fair, no local operator or certification program can single-handedly offset the sweeping damage of unchecked climate change, which remains the primary driver of global ocean declines. But even within that context, the industry’s own approach has often fallen short. Training programs, voluntary standards, “sustainable tourism” workshops, eco-labels—you name it. The common thread? A reliance on voluntary goodwill rather than building in real, systemic accountability.

Without binding requirements, certifications often devolve into marketing. Without policy support, efforts remain piecemeal. Without financial redistribution, communities remain excluded. The result is forty years of promises with too little to show in terms of actual recovery or resilience.

Trade Group Paralysis

Take DEMA, the Diving Equipment & Marketing Association, the industry’s largest trade body. To its credit, DEMA has supported initiatives like Project AWARE and promoted responsible diver behavior. These efforts matter, and they’ve helped raise awareness among divers worldwide.

But good intentions have limits. For years, DEMA’s broader advocacy has remained defiantly resistant, sidestepping the reality that climate change is an existential threat to the very reefs divers travel to see. That avoidance is striking for an industry whose future quite literally rests on living coral.

This posture weakens credibility. If the leading trade group can’t bring itself to speak loudly and urgently about climate action, stronger protections, and fairer economic structures, then the industry risks confusing incremental awareness campaigns with true conservation leadership. To protect reefs, the bar has to be set higher.

When Dive Dollars Fund MPAs

To be fair, dive tourism sometimes does generate conservation wins. Park entry fees in Bonaire, Raja Ampat, Roatan, Galapagos, Cabo Pulmo, South Africa's Aliwal Shoal, and Palau have provided steady funding streams for MPAs. These examples show that tourism dollars can protect ecosystems.

But here’s the catch: if those dollars don’t also support living wages for dive workers, compensate local fishers, and include communities in governance, then they are simply extractive economics in neoprene suits. True conservation requires equity as much as biology. Otherwise, the model replicates colonial patterns under the guise of “eco.”

The Bottom Line

Dive tourism may help in small, localized ways, but it is not yet a reliable, just, or scalable foundation for ocean conservation. The $20 billion headline hides uncomfortable truths: offshore profits, greenwashed optics, inequitable labor, and ecosystems still in decline.

This isn’t about shaming divers. It’s about asking the industry to live up to the love we all share for the ocean, and to align its promises with real conservation impact.

Love Diving? Do Better With It

If you love diving, use that love as fuel:

• Ask who benefits. Support operators who hire, train, and uplift local staff.

• Back community-shaped protections. Conservation must be with, not over, local people.

• Demand policy change. Tourism cannot substitute for strong ocean governance.

• Pressure DEMA to take a real stand on climate change. It's far past time for the trade body's leadership to step up or step aside.

• Be an active diver. Learn the history of the reefs you visit. Ask tough questions. Advocate for reefs long after your gear is dry.

Because bubbles are beautiful, but they burst. The ocean needs something more durable.

© 2025 Ocean Hoptimism. Reuse with credit only.